↓ Archives ↓

Archive → May, 2010

Typical characteristics of antiBNP’ers

What they Think of YOU.

It has been a bit quiet the last few days. It seems Gri££in has gone away for a while, the usual BNP supporters have diminished and all is good in the world Not much going on in BNP-land at all other than their own internal civil war.

But just for fun, the Official BNP Facebook Group has a great thread from a short while ago. I’m NOT saying this is the official view of the BNP, its just one thread. I have removed names of those posting, as they are entitled to their views, free speech, the stuff democracy is made of (the stuff that destroyed them at the elections), did not all agree with the thread, but it does show the mindset of a certain calibre of BNP activist, such as those that think the anti BNP are just unwashed far left.

ALL of britain, left and right (and even insider)s stood up against the BNP in the recent election.
____________________________________________________________________

Typical characteristics of antiBNP’ers

Keith Fairhurst The characteristics are:

1) Low cognitive complexity.

I find most members of the far left are extremely quick to slap degrading labels from a limited list on anyone who disagrees with them. “Racist” tends to be a slur thrown at anyone with concerns on immigration. “Nazi” is a charming term used for anybody past the middle of the right and their forums label any dissenters as
“trolls”.

Such tags seem to help them feel secure. By slapping hysterical epithets on anyone who challenges their views, the far left avoid debate and keep their own feeling of security intact.

2) Strong pro-censorship views

Campaigns for censorship or removal of opposition groups is a regular occurrence. Many left extremists will gladly advocate their “no platform” policy. They argue that some views are “too extreme” to deserve free speech. The irony that they are the ones acting as both judge and executioner seems lost on them.

3) Avoidance of debate

From webmasters to bloggers to activist leaders. There seems no room for discussion however sensible and neutral it may seem. When challenged to a debate, the left will resort to one of the two aforementioned tactics. Explanation or sensible challenge to their policies is unwelcome. This should be evident from the censored comments featured in my blog.

4) Lack of genuine political activity

You will note that most of the activist groups are only activists, they rarely engage in electoral politics or attempt to make a lasting change. I liken this to someone who frequently criticises the views of another in a debate, but never offers views of his or her own. The groups on the far left that are registered as a party receive very few votes.

5) Refusal to “play fair” and a tendency to violence

This trait is, of course, prevalent in all politics but it is most obvious in this sector. The left will engage in intimidation and subsequent physical intervention if the intimidation fails. For one example, look at the “Oxford Union debate” saga. After repeated lobbying failed, the left responded to Oxford Union’s democratic decision to invite two controversial speakers by physically forcing their way into the Union and heckling and blocking invited students who wanted to get in.

6) Hysteria and mass propaganda

The groups featured in this site will resort to any twisting of reality and mass propaganda that they believe furthers their cause. A popular tactic is to find a particularly unpleasant or worrying story (or exaggerate one) and find any way possible to connect it to the group they wish to damage.

For example, the site ‘Lancaster UAF’ retold a story of a woman in France committing suicide by immolation. The site then reprinted a few foolish comments from Nazi site “Stormfront” and presented the comments as being from BNP supporters. The only justification or evidence for this was the lie: “Stormfront is popular with BNP supporters”. The rest of the article was hysterical vituperation of the BNP, designed to make the reader forget how false the connection between the two events was.

Should I find these characteristics to change or further traits to emerge, I will change this page. For now, don’t take my word for it. Examine the evidence and decide for yourselves
#
John XXXX Fear of washing, anti-perspirants, work, haircuts, shaving
01 March 2009 at 10:25 • Report
#
Sarah XXXX And low physical attractiveness, I find!
02 March 2009 at 22:32 • Report
#
Mark XXXX gotta agree with the haircuts. scruffy bastards
02 March 2009 at 22:50 • Report
#
Sophie XXXX Hi Keith, I fail to see how your list we help the BNP party recruit more members.

03 March 2009 at 09:33 • Report
#
Mark XXX i dont think this group is here to recruit more members. thinking people would change their political stance and join a party because of a facebook group is naive. The group exists so people who do support the BNP can discuss the issues they are concerned with and can express their opinions without being shot down. Now the fact that we are always getting called “racist” and “nazis” by liberal left wing student looking types and the fact they basically hate our gutts, for me justifies a thread discussing the cretins. just my opinion of course

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Griffins Explains That the BNP is Too Bad to Be True

Not My Voice- come join us

Griffins Explains That the BNP is Too Bad to Be True

Griffins is still trying to digest the election failure and the news coming his way, from criminal assaults by members (‘brave’ Bob Bailey) to huge demands for his resignation, the party splitting, and members leaving etc shows that there are huge amounts of bad publicity for him to counter. A while ago Gri££in set up a media rebuttal department for the BNP. How effective was this? Its was so good, it became a joke. Instead of countering story with facts, it ended up with threats, making the party look worse. Remember Paul Golding being caught out lying?

The response by the Media Rebuttal Unit, or Operation Fightback, as they often called it responded by threats, asking for many people to undertake a course of action against British businesses,so that

“if enough people do this, then they will be cowed”

a simple but subtle statement, but understand the definition of to cowed

(kou)
tr.v. cowed, cow•ing, cows
To frighten with threats or a show of force. See Synonyms at intimidate.

Intimidation (also called cowing) is intentional behavior “which would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities” fear of injury or harm. It’s not necessary to prove that the behavior was so violent as to cause terror or that the victim was actually frightened.
Read More on That Story

Media Rebuttal -  BNP Style
Media rebuttal – BNP Style

Now without the web skill of Simon Bennet, and his cyber activism. Griffins new media rebuttal is just a simple statement…

“If you hear anything that sounds too bad to be true about the people …(and) this party, then understand that it probably isn’t true.”

Yes, the bad news about Griffin and the BNP is soooo bad it just did not happen- it was too bad to be true.

It appears BNP threats and intimidation has diminished without Bennet, but it now carries more threats to those who remain interested in the BNP …

“Those who… whisper poison against colleagues but who publicly profess loyalty or ‘concern for the party’, should be called to account at every turn”.

We all know what being called to account by the BNP involves. Griffin seems to say, don’t dare question us. And for any future news, when more crap hits the BNP fan

“You’ll hear it in the disgusting accusations of fraud, theft and all sorts of horror stories that are already being hawked around by various Searchlight and direct state assets who have burrowed into the party over the years.”

So, next time there is another story about the BNP, just remember; it wont be true, because its likely to show how bad the BNP are, be it fraud, theft and all sorts of horror stories.

And don’t forget, don’t ever question Gri££in; you will be called to account, at every turn.

Anyway, here is Griffins letter in full.

Griffin and god-knows-who

Britain Has Entered a New Political Era -
Post Election Analysis by Chairman Nick Griffin

Chairman Nick Griffin
Dear Fellow Patriot,

So the election dust has now settled, and from our point of view there are four key outcomes:

First, the resulting hung Parliament and political instability will rapidly add to Gordon Brown’s economic disaster. The Bank of England prediction that whoever won this election will end up being “out of power for a generation” is now going to apply to two of the three old parties. That’s bad news for Britain, but good news for us.

Second, although many people were initially disappointed that the enormously sympathetic response (yes, don’t worry; it wasn’t just you, it had me going too!) we received from the public during the campaign did not translate into huge votes, the fact remains that this was the best general election result in the history of British nationalism. The headline figures tell us what we need to know:

* Total votes cast 563,743. This compares with 192,746 votes secured by the BNP in 117 seats in 2005. The nearest comparison historically is with 1979, when the National Front fought the now easily broken record of 303 seats, from which it garnered a feeble 191,719 votes

* There were a record number of deposits saved. This would undoubtedly have been even higher were it not for us missing out on crossing this important threshold in a number of seats by the votes that were undoubtedly lost in each constituency thanks to the confusion and concern caused by the unforgiveable sabotage of our website.

* The 6,620 votes I secured in Barking is the highest number ever cast for a BNP (or in fact for any British nationalist party) candidate in a general election.

* BNP candidates beat UKIP in the majority of seats where we went head-to-head – despite their party having vastly more money and receiving relentless media puffs. And we positively slaughtered the Greens.

Third, our frankly shocking wipe-out from Barking & Dagenham council is, when we look at the facts, not some terrible indictment of our councillors or leadership, but simply the result of a paradigm shift in the quality of Labour’s election-winning machine.

Four years ago, the British National Party, Respect and the Christian People’s Alliance between us dealt a series of shattering blows to Labour, particularly in Barking & Dagenham, Stoke, Tower Hamlets and Newham.

Rather than losing heart and wasting time blaming each other, Labour took this as a wakeup call and set about improving their election machine.

Opposition plants, sacked and bitter incompetents and ambitious knaves may use such moments to try to advance their own personal agendas, but looking for better ways to do things next time is what mature parties with real ambitions do.

Last year I wrote that Labour’s use against us of state-of-the-art US techniques imported by Obama’s Blue State Digital team was only a trial run, and that the real target in the long term was the Tory party.

Some people may not have believed me then, but look at what Labour just achieved by rolling out BSD’s potent mix of targeted voter contact, sophisticated data basing and the ruthless use of deceit and lies to sway vulnerable voters.

It didn’t just knock us out in Barking & Dagenham and take 10 of Respect’s 11 seats in Tower Hamlets, but it also eliminated all opposition on Newham council, wiping out Respect and turning a confident Christian People’s Alliance challenge into the loss of all three of their existing seats.

Despite Blair, despite Brown, the strong local challenges of three radical alternative parties have been crushed, leaving the whole of East London, from the edge of the City right out to the horsey fields of Essex, a Labour one party state.

The same tactics were also rolled out against the Tories and Lib Dems in other key areas, with the result that Labour, despite losing heavily in the general election, walked back into control of no fewer than 14 major councils up and down the country.

I am not saying that our inability to stand up to the Labour steamroller is not in part our own fault – of course it is. Our elections department did rest on its four- or five- year-old laurels, despite our failure to win a by-election for more than two years.

Personally I should have acted quicker to reinvigorate that side of the party – putting Clive Jefferson in charge with the brief to bring his innovative approach to wooing and securing the postal vote (the advance he pioneered that undoubtedly won us our two northern Euro seats last year) was something I should have done earlier.

But there’s no use crying over spilt milk or beating ourselves up over our failure to stand up to Labour’s brilliantly effective new techniques.

Rather, we must learn from the scientifically applied beating we’ve just received, and equip ourselves to hand out the same to our opponents in future.

I’m looking forward to that, and I know that it can and will be done.

The fourth and final point is that we have just seen the last first-past-the-post major election contest in British history.

Apart from local council elections, which may continue to be held on the old basis for some time yet, first-past-the-post is finished; Britain has entered a new political era.

Next year we have the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliamentary elections – proportional representation (PR) contests in which we can win (we only missed out winning last time around in Wales by a few thousand votes, and our Welsh results last week all showed further clear improvements).

In two years’ time we have another round of Greater London Assembly elections – a PR contest in which we have already shown we can win.

Just two years after that we’ll be back contesting the European elections, defending our two seats and aiming to win more.

And probably even before then, we’ll be facing another general election. That too will almost certainly be fought with a PR system.

If a pure one were to be adopted, last week’s showing would give us twelve MPs, which would compare well with UKIP’s twenty and the Greens’ six.

In fact, the Powers-That-Be will probably plump for a less fair system, but even the worst one possible is likely to lower the threshold for victory from the present mountain of about 36 percent down to a relative molehill of 15 percent. I know which target I’d rather have to reach.

Even more worrying for Labour and their hate-filled far-left mercenaries, the voter targeting they have now mastered in local elections is many times harder to roll out in the much larger constituencies that have to be used to make PR work.

We can, and will, learn ways to use techniques such as mass telephone contacts to boost and then mobilise our core vote in those future contests, but they are far harder to apply in the negative way we’ve just seen rough us up so effectively at local level.

With all major elections from now on therefore inevitably scheduled to involve PR, our opponents have just one year in which to break the British National Party.

Make no mistake, the forces of political hell are about to be unleashed on us. ‘Operation Total Destruction of the BNP’ is being rolled out right now.

You can see it in the fake emails supposedly from me and our London organiser, the brave Bob Bailey, in which we attack each other. Disastrous news – if it were only true, but fortunately it’s not. And it would take much more than bogus emails to break the trust that people like Bob and I have in each other.

You’ll hear it in the disgusting accusations of fraud, theft and all sorts of horror stories that are already being hawked around by various Searchlight and direct state assets who have burrowed into the party over the years.

Their previous subtle negativity, ‘misjudgements’ and minor acts of ‘accidental’ disruption are now being replaced by outright lies and sabotage in a last desperate throw of the dice to break our party before it’s too late.

Again, if their tales were true, it would be a disgrace, but fortunately they are not.

Old hands have seen it before, of course, back in 1979. And that’s the real good news, because enough of us know what we will now have to face together to be able to guide our party through this treacherous passage of stormy and rocky waters.

The would-be wreckers, waving their fake lighthouse lanterns from various deadly cliffs, will get short shrift from us.

Those who offer easy routes to victory, or who whisper poison against colleagues but who publicly profess loyalty or ‘concern for the party’, should be called to account at every turn.

If you hear anything that sounds too bad to be true about the people who have transformed this party thus far, and who united will do even more good, then understand that it probably isn’t true.

New readers might at this point be thinking, “what’s going on here, surely this isn’t what happens in normal political parties?”

Well, friends new and old alike, that’s quite right. Because the BNP is NOT a “normal political party.”

In fact, in reality, we are much more than a political party, and have no desire to be like the others. For this is not a “party”, so much as a movement – nay, the movement – of national salvation.

Without a complete change of course our entire nation and civilisation are heading for the rocks and for irrevocable disaster.

The old parties, the internationalist masters of the media, and the super rich and the banksters they all ultimately serve, are all happy with that deadly course. After all, they charted it.

So why should anyone who understands that be surprised to learn that these people – with all their money, all their greed, all their ruthlessness and all their fear of justice and the anger of a people betrayed – will use a combination of apparently ‘internal’ squabbles, wicked and baseless accusations against the innocent, and no doubt a wave of legal attacks from without, to try to drive this party to destruction over the months ahead.

They can try; they are trying – but with your loyalty and true British team spirit and dogged determination, they will fail. Our day will come – because, together, we will make it come.
Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

Griffin Blames BNP Failure On…(Can You Guess).

Not My Voice- come join us

Griffins new letter and he gives a reason why he lost the election. IT WAZ FORIGNERZ!!1!

and Labour. Yes, there is nothing he won’t blame on non (pre approved) whites or Reds/Commies (ie Labour, of course). Maybe someone should tell Griffin, labour LOST the elections.

I cant understand why he says this

“The formulae is simple: if you don’t vote Labour they will replace you!”.

How would Griffin explain the swing to the conservatives and the huge numbers they won? Were they ‘replaced’? no.  Griffin is clearly insane and I think he has probably lost lots of sleep, reliving the moment where he lost to Labour.

“BNP polling station tellers were shocked and horrified on polling day to witness the enormous queues of foreign faces”.

Maybe they have special goggles, but what is the difference between a British face and er….. a Polish face?

Griffin doesn’t explain how people, are replaced. Did labour knock on your door at midnight, and you are carted away, your home occupied by a labour voter?

This type of thinking is insane.

“This historical catastrophe for our people must fill us with renewed determination to increase our work rate, our readiness to sacrifice, and our steely resolve never to give up.”

We all know what this means….. begging letters. Give us money or its too late!

Its  the same old, same old. Asking people to join a party doesn’t actually do that much, to win elections; its getting people to vote for you is what counts. And you couldn’t do that.  Just wait for the next round of begging letters when the EHRC come back again.

But Griffins must have nightmares over Barking, because this letter is all about HIS experience. He forgets to mention that the BNP stood in many areas through out the UK. The net results was…. 1.9% of the vote and nearly half of what the polled it the Euro 2009. Explain that please Mr Griffin. Explain how labour has replaced everyone in the UK . Replaced to vote Conservative, LibDem, Green, UKIP etc.

Griffin ends the letter with

“I leave you with the words of our hero Winston Churchill: “We will defend our island, no matter what the cost may be. We will NEVER surrender!”

I will end this letter with the words of BNP’s Collet  the same man you tolerated in the party only until he decided to get rid of you, “Churchill was a C*nt…”

__________________________________________________________________

Barking & Dagenham demographic disaster. . .

Time is running out, Britain is dying.

Dear Fellow Patriot,

The electoral wipe-out in Barking & Dagenham shocked us all. Our hopes of victory at parliamentary and local level evaporated as we were left with no councillors at all.

We were heartbroken when Labour usurped all 51 seats on the council and the slimy wretch Margaret Hodge romped home to victory with an overwhelming vote.

A defeat, yes, but the events in Barking & Dagenham are a terrifying wake up call to us all. Faced with the election of 12 BNP councillors years ago, Labour set about a deliberate process to flood Barking & Dagenham with foreigners, replacing the newly politically conscious local British with an imported electorate guaranteed to vote Labour.

The formulae is simple: if you don’t vote Labour they will replace you!

We were defeated by simple demographics. The percentage of foreigners in Barking & Dagenham has sky-rocketed over the last 4 years, up from around 15% to nearly 40%, and BNP polling station tellers were shocked and horrified on polling day to witness the enormous queues of foreign faces eagerly waiting to vote for their party, Labour.

The old East End of London is now completely dead. By the time another General Election comes about, our ancient capital city will be completely overrun, a lost cause under the current electoral system. London has perished. Labour has succeeded where the Luftwaffe failed.

This historical catastrophe for our people must fill us with renewed determination to increase our work rate, our readiness to sacrifice, and our steely resolve never to give up.

Don’t delude yourself: what we are witnessing is nothing less than the gradual eradication of our people from our ancient homeland.

We have lost our capital city; it is our choice whether we lose the rest of our country.

So I appeal to everyone reading this message, now is the time to join the British National Party. Don’t leave it until it is too late to make a stand. Time is running out, fast. We are one generation away from Armageddon.

Think of your family. Think of our War Heroes and how they suffered and perished. Think of our innocent children and the future they have in store. You know what is happening, and the terrifying consequences for all you love if our Cause does not succeed, have you really got a choice?

It is time to do the honourable, noble thing: join the British Resistance.

I am hoping that our web team can report back to me in 24 hours that 250 people have answered my call to action. I am depending on YOU to help me build this resilient movement into a party capable of making the tiny amount of time still available really count.

I leave you with the words of our hero Winston Churchill: “We will defend our island, no matter what the cost may be. We will NEVER surrender!”

Griffins Easter Madness and his Medieval Christianity

Griffins Easter Madness and his Medieval Christianity

BNP Easter Email

Here is Griffins letter from Easter.   It was published to much ridicule on various  pro and anti BNP groups. It seemed no one believed Griffin. Tt demonstrates why he was bound to fail at the election.  However I do want to republish this for this simple promise from Griffin;

“After the General Election, ALL (emphasis added) BNP leaflets will carry a Christian Cross to demonstrate our commitment to maintaining and preserving our Christian heritage as a nation”

For those of you who did not see the original document it was posted by Griffin and it follows  some form of conversion to Christianity, honestly.   But don’t forget, its not the Christianity you or I know…

“I do not mean the gut-wrenching politically correct quasi-Marxist nonsense spewing forth from the treacherous leaders of the modern Anglican Church”

What? Since when is Marxism Christian?

Anyway, I’m sure he means the Christianity that Christ preached – love, tolerance for your fellow man, non racist.

Guess not;

“I mean the traditional, upright, decent and honest Christianity that defended Europe from Islamic conquest, the Christianity of the Crusades and the Christianity of our forefathers.

Strewth!  He means  pre renaissance Christianity. For example the type of Christianity that destroyed the largest and richest Christian city in the world – Constantinople in 1204, by the 4th Crusade. Wonderful!

Griffin states

“we are the defenders of Britain’s Christian heritage, just like our Crusader ancestors in the Middle Ages.”

Middle ages?

Hell On Earth
Medieval Christianity: Hell on Earth.

Submit or Burn
Medieval Christianity: submit or burn

Gives you an idea of what Griffin has in store for you.  Lets see what Christian images he has on all his new post election material.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Special Easter Message from the Chairman

Dear Fellow Patriot,

A special event that happened recently has changed my outlook on our struggle and the situation facing our sacred country. That event was the peaceful, sensible, mature debate with the Christian Party leader George Hargreaves and a large number of Christian Party members. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire debate which was noticeably absent of the usual hysterical fanaticism of the liberal-left.

It made me think long and hard about a new dimension of our struggle: our Christian religion, culture and traditions. In the past too much emphasis has been placed on the ethnic aspect of our present national dilemma, whilst the longest running feature of our identity has been overlooked: the fact that our country has been held together and guided for millennia by our common, ancient religion: Christianity.

And before you misunderstand me, I do not mean the gut-wrenching politically correct quasi-Marxist nonsense spewing forth from the treacherous leaders of the modern Anglican Church. I mean the traditional, upright, decent and honest Christianity that defended Europe from Islamic conquest, the Christianity of the Crusades and the Christianity of our forefathers.

There is nothing in traditional Christianity about world government, abolishing the nations, enslaving the world to finance capitalism and big business, eradicating traditional unique cultures and national identities, the promotion of sexual perversion, the glorification of treason, letting criminals run rampant and political correctness.

No, the Christianity of our forefathers was about honesty, family, patriotism, sacrifice, loyalty, king and country. For over 1,000 years Christianity held our people together and guided us through the centuries. If Christianity had not existed Europe would have been conquered by Islam centuries ago.

I made the irrefutable point during the debate with the Christian Party that the British National Party is the only political organisation in Britain that wants to keep this country fundamentally Christian, with Christian values, traditions and culture. Every other political party would happily allow Islam to engulf our Christian homeland.

After the General Election, all BNP leaflets will carry a Christian Cross to demonstrate our commitment to maintaining and preserving our Christian heritage as a nation. Politically correct scoundrels like Rowen Williams will cry fowl but we have nothing to be ashamed of as we are the defenders of Britain’s Christian heritage, just like our Crusader ancestors in the Middle Ages.

So this weekend enjoy the Christian festival of Easter with pride and remember the War Heroes that fell in the many wars to defend our homeland. Be proud of your British, Christian identity and reject the false guilt and self-loathing of the liberal-left political class.

The darkest hour is just before the dawn, but be of good cheer for Christ Our Lord is risen!

Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin

Nick Griffin, MEP

Leader, British National Party

PS: We have thrown off the shackles of the Equalities Commission’s criminal attack on our Party. Now we are weeks away from a General Election and without your generous support our ability to fight as many seats as possible will be restricted. Please send a small gift today:

Read more

The criminal membership ban has been lifted and British patriots are once again able to join the British National Party. Join the British Resistance today:

Read more

> Forward to a friend   > Unsubscribe

Blocked by your spam filter?

Add newsletter@bnp.org.uk to your address book

British National Party 2009. PO Box 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP

Blocked by your spam filter?
Add newsletter@bnp.org.uk to your address book

British National Party 2009. PO Box 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP

__________________________________________________________
Hargreaves
Griffin and Hargreaves

Ironically, this mixed race media event, which Griffin boasts about, would actually be illegal under the Clause 28 against racial integration, as declared in the BNP Manifesto 2010. Does his hypocrisy know no limit?

BNP Open Civil War – Griffin’s Rant.

Not My Voice- come join us

BNP Open Civil War – Griffin’s Rant.

Here is Griffins New message- it details the current civil war within the BNP.  There are two messages, the first one is trying to put a spin on the election results. the second (this one) appears to be in response to accusations captured and posted on line by the amazing 1million United team and Vote-No.

Of interest are is this pathetic way of covering over any bad news. No longer able to defend the undefendable he just says this in his first letter (to be published later);

“if you hear anything that sounds too bad to be true about the people who have transformed this party thus far, and who united will do even more good, then understand that it probably isn’t true.”

Yes, Bob Bailey kicking the shit out of some Asian lads face wasn’t probably true, hey? because it was that awful.

pathetic realy.

He also states this…”"Mr Butler knows the party’s accounts are always published in full and are subjected to the most rigorous scrutiny by forces intensely hostile to the BNP,” Really ? that’s why the BNP have been fined so many times.

but anyway, digest the letter and feel free to comment.

_____________________________________________________________________

An Update from BNP Leader Nick Griffin

Griffin Looking down on you

BNP Leader Mr Griffin has responded to an email sent out to BNP supporters purportedly by the party’s former National Elections Officer, Eddy Butler, which contained a number of explicit and implicit attacks on the current leadership team.

“I have not yet had an opportunity to speak to Mr Butler over the email, and as of yet don’t know if it is another fake email like the one rapidly rebutted by Bob Bailey,” Mr Griffin said.

Griffin and odd bloke

“I find it somewhat difficult to believe that it could be real, as the email says that the election has been a setback ‘after five years work’ and that the party must ‘move out of stagnant waters’.

“First, our General Election results – though they did not reflect the enormous ’soft’ public sympathy we all encountered on the doorsteps – were significantly better than five years ago. Second, Mr Butler was responsible for all our election campaigns for nearly a decade, including all the planning for the most recent one, so I cannot imagine he is actually criticising his own performance or seeking to blame others, since any ’stagnation’ that has occurred in our campaigning abilities would primarily be his responsibility,” Mr Griffin said.

“The email also calls for financial transparency. Once again, I cannot see how this email can be from Mr Butler and in good faith because he has sat on the BNP’s advisory council for nearly ten years and has never once mentioned this as an issue before. As National Organiser he had the position from which to raise any genuine concerns, but has never done so.

“Mr Butler knows the party’s accounts are always published in full and are subjected to the most rigorous scrutiny by forces intensely hostile to the BNP,” continued Mr. Griffin.

“The Advisory Council on which Mr. Butler sat until very recently is responsible for choosing and appointing the independent chartered accountant who scrutinises and audits every single penny of income and expenditure. Neither Mr. Butler nor his close friend Mark Collett, nor any other member of the A.C., have ever questioned our employment of Frank Hogarth of Messrs Silver & Co as our professional independent auditor.

“Nor have Messrs Butler or Collett made the slightest attempt to exercise their right as members of the Advisory Council to inspect the party’s central and regional accounts and to question any National Treasurer about any aspect of the party’s finances at any of the dozens of Advisory Council and senior management meetings they have attended over their years in post.

“Additionally, Mr. Butler is also well aware that our independently audited accounts are every years subjected to intense and detailed scrutiny by the Electoral Commission – a body which has a clearly established record of bias against and hostility to our party. The Electoral Commission has a brief to ensure full transparency in the accounts of all political parties, and holds us to the highest standards of accountability.

“Mr Butler, who was until recently a European staff member employee, also knows that Andrew Brons and I are not permitted to so much as touch a cent of our European staff salary allowance money. This is paid direct from the European Parliament to our Paying Agent, another chartered accountant, who is approved by them and bound not only by law but also by his professional code of conduct to handle all such funds with the utmost probity. Mr. Butler would be extremely well aware of this reality, since he has been paid a substantial salary for his work for us as MPs every month since August last year.

“Our office expenses money is transferred directly to our constituency office managers into accounts run by two signatories. A full account of this income and the expenditure of this money in the North West region has been kept from Day 1 by Tina Wingfield and has been available on my website for months.

“However, the thing that really makes me the most sceptical as to whether Mr Butler has written this email and whether it is written in good faith is its shockingly shallow discussion about party leadership.

“I don’t believe for a second that Mr Butler would really think that having a ‘pretty face’ as a new leader would stop a single attack against the BNP by the controlled mass media.

“Mr Butler has been in nationalist politics for decades and knows very well that it is the ideas for which the party stands which cause them to attack us. The personality or style of the leader, election candidates and others make not one jot of difference to those professional liars,” Mr Griffin said.

“The suggestion that it would, might fool a handful of the most naive new members – as it is clearly someone’s intention – but no seasoned nationalist could really believe such naive and politically juvenile nonsense for one moment.

“That said, it is clear that someone is out to cause trouble, and appears to have done so using an email list acquired during his or her time working for us. That, of course, is a breach of our Constitution as well as of our members’ rights under the Data Protection Act. Formal solicitor’s letters have today been sent to three former members of staff reminding them of their obligations in this regard and warning that any flouting of the law will be met with injunctions and claims for damages.”

In conclusion, Mr. Griffin has this message for all our members and supporters: “Of course the local council results were deeply disappointing, but the answer has to be to learn from how Labour organised to maximise their vote and depress not only ours but also those of Respect and the Christians. We are already well into that process, and I’m looking forward to our rolling out the Education & Training programme that will turn our new knowledge and techniques into productive action for the future.

“Most important of all, more than 8,000 enquiries have already been passed from our Belfast admin centre to our Regional Organisers. That’s a huge harvest of potential new members and activists just waiting to be visited and signed up. Speed is of the essence here, so this is no time for ‘what ifs?’ and navel gazing. Together, we’ve got work to do!”

Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin

Nick Griffin, MEP

Leader, British National Party

‘Well-Oiled’ Griffin Thanks His Party (Or Those Left In It).

Not My Voice- come join us

‘Well-Oiled’ Griffin Thanks His Party (Or Those Left In It).

I posted this on 1million United FB on the group a few minutes after Griffin had emailed it, on the night before election. However, due to the number of users, this Blogg site crashed.  But here is his letter. It was done in the usual 1980’s Readers Digest style (thanks Simon Bennet).
____________________________________________________

Thank You

General Election 2010
Dear Fellow Patriot,

We are now hours away from the close of polls. Despite the Equalities Commission’s legal assault on the Party, we managed to field the largest number of candidates in British history.

Over 18 million leaflets have been distributed nationwide. So far we have received around 10,000 fresh enquiries, over 5,000 have already been speedily dispatched to the Regions thanks to our highly efficient administrative setup, which we put in place last year and which is now a well-oiled machine.

Our new Communications Department and media handling systems have negated the majority of the negative publicity that would have had an adverse effect on our campaign. Compare the months leading up the Euro Elections, where smears and poison spewed forth daily, to the massively reduced, but no less vicious, media garbage we have endured this year.

This election, regardless of the results, is the watershed for this Party. Behind the scenes, for the first time ever, we have deployed strategies that only a few short years ago that were completely beyond our capabilities and wildest dreams.

In key target areas, we have, for the first time in our history, and in excess of anything any other party attempted, sent out hundreds of thousands of professionally produced marketing packs to voters in addition to some of the best political literature we have ever produced.

We have been able to implement these ambitious schemes because of the investment we have made in machinery, systems, software and professional staff. This has been made possible by the generosity of our members, supporters and donors.

We cut our teeth with the new methods and technology last year in the Euro Elections, now this year we have really managed to harness the potential of our new systems, but the exciting thing is we now realise that we are only utilising a small fraction of our true potential.

This is the last election the British National Party fights as a large small party – we are now a small LARGE party.

What’s more, our enemies know this. That is why they used every weapon in their armoury to keep us down. However, despite their best efforts we are Britain’s fastest growing political party and attracting decent right-thinking people from all the other parties who are now beginning to realise the danger this nation now faces.

Remember, this is a General Election, and normally the BNP is squeezed in the big battle between the never-ending cycle of Conservative and Labour governments. This situation has been made worse by the media hype of the Lib-Dems and Nick Clegg, obviously designed to soak up protest votes.

So how do we measure our success tomorrow morning? Yes, it would be fantastic to gain our first MP, but the fact that we have mounted our biggest ever parliamentary election campaign and fielded over 330 candidates a mere 11 months after the super-human effort we put into our successful Euro Election campaign is just incredible and despite the court battles with the EHRC, and the membership freeze, all of which devoured huge sums of money, our growth and resilience is truly inspiring .

The fact that we were able to plan, finance and implement this massive General Election campaign sends out a clear signal to the whole rotten establishment: The BNP has arrived and will be knocking on the doors of power sooner than some ever imagined!
____________________________________________________________

Right who’s first to spot the irony of ‘assault’ considering the recent BNP thugs kicking a young Asian man in the face….

or this one

” … thanks to our highly efficient administrative setup, which we put in place last year and which is now a well-oiled machine.”

you mean the one that lost you Collet and Bennet?

or this…

“This is the last election the British National Party fights as a large small party – we are now a small LARGE party.”

come again?

And this

“BNP has arrived and will be knocking on the doors of power sooner than some ever imagined!”

Or knocking on the jobcentre’s door? Griffin and co seems to have gone into hiding and there have been ‘rumblings

http://1millionunited.org/blogs/blog/2010/05/08/bnp-leadership-issues-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1033

Griffin also did appear to go quite insane, to cliam this as a fact

“we managed to field the largest number of candidates in British history”

Larger than any other party, EVER?

Quite insane…

________________________________________________________________________________

Revealed! Griffin’s Well-Oiled Election Machine

Griffins Well-Oiled Election Machine

BNP Election Failure 2010: Griffin Speaks

Not My Voice- come join us

Griffin discusses his election failure for the first time. Many epic failures here.
they seem to have forgotten the Euro elections, in which they got just under 1 million votes. this time, it has been nearly halved.

Anyway, here is his letter in full…

Dear Fellow Patriot,

I appreciate that everybody is feeling very tired after this bruising campaign and some disappointing headline results. In fact, as you will see later in this message, behind the media’s sneers, there is real concern about the progress that we have made in this extraordinarily hard-fought contest.

With the result now in, Britain faces its first “hung parliament” since 1974 and the next Government – if there is to be one and not a new election in a few months’ time – will be a coalition of two of the main parties.

Ironically, this provides the British National Party (which spectacularly almost tripled its vote from 2005, jumping from 192,746 to a healthy 563,743 in yesterday’s contest) with its best window of opportunity yet.

The kingmaker in any coalition will be the Liberal Democrats under Nick Clegg. Their key demand for participation in a coalition is electoral reform, and in particular the abolition of the current “first-past-the-post” election system. The reason why the Liberal Democrats oppose the first-past-the-post system is that it clearly puts a smaller party (which is what the Liberal Democrats are) at a hugely unfair disadvantage.

The figures tell the story: yesterday the Liberal Democrats won around 23 percent of the vote, but will end up with only 7 percent of the seats in Parliament. The BNP, which polled close to a million votes in June 2009, and over half a million yesterday (despite only fighting half of all the available 650 seats), will end up with no seats at all.

In effect, the first-past-the-post system simply throws millions of votes onto the rubbish heap where they are ignored. As a result, the Liberal Democrats have argued for the introduction of proportional representation (PR) in Britain.

Under a PR system, if a party gets 10 percent of the votes, it gets 10 percent of the seats in Parliament. If it gets 32 percent of the vote, it gets 32 percent of the seats, and so on.

It is an obviously fairer way of allowing all votes cast in an election be reflected in Parliament. In fact, a slightly amended system of PR is used in European Parliamentary elections, which allowed the BNP to win its two seats in that body in June 2009.

If the Liberal Democrats are involved in a coalition with either Labour or Conservatives, it is inevitable that they will set the demand for a PR system as one of the preconditions for their cooperation.

In fact, Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg has already made this demand in public – and both Labour and Conservatives have announced their willingness to consider it or, at the very least, hold a referendum on the topic.

What does this mean for the BNP? The tripling of the BNP vote on 6 May has some important implications.

Firstly, where we went head-to-head with UKIP and the Greens, we thrashed them. We outvoted UKIP in 178 seats and they beat us in 123. We outvoted the Greens in 134 seats for the Greens 23. UKIP had a huge budget and their campaign was backed by 13 MEPs, in it must not be forgotten that both UKIP and the Greens enjoy favourable treatment at the hands of the controlled media.

Secondly, while all minority parties were pushed out to the edge by the ‘big boys’, our vote not only held up but proportionately increased when compared to our June 2009 Euro election results.

When put into perspective, yesterday’s result becomes even more interesting:

- In 1983, the BNP fought 54 seats and polled 14,000 votes.

- In 1987, the BNP fought 2 seats and polled 563 votes.

- In 1992, the BNP fought 13 seats and polled 7,000 votes.

- In 1997, the BNP fought 54 seats and polled 35,000 votes.

- In 2001, the BNP fought 33 seats and polled 47,000 votes.

- In 2005, the BNP fought 117 seats and polled 192,746 votes.

- In 2010, the BNP fought 339 seats and polled 563,743 votes.

Based on yesterday’s impressive vote totals, the BNP would win in excess of 60 seats in Westminster under a PR system.

Some of the more perceptive Conservative journalists, such as Norman Tebbit, have already realised this as a possibility and have written about it in national newspapers.

In addition, many political commentators have already remarked that, on a night which saw all the smaller parties squeezed – including the Lib-Dems, who lost five seats – the strong showing and turnout of the BNP vote was “a source of great concern.”

They have seen how the public hostility towards us is fast disappearing. I felt it on the streets and I’m sure you did too.

Compare this with a few years ago when we endured frequent confrontations and ’screamers’. This election we enjoyed a very friendly response on the streets and no aggravation (apart from the exception of activists from Labour’s far left thuggish allies).

I have heard reports from all over the country, and have experienced it for myself, that the ’screamers’ who used to pop out of the woodwork in almost every street, have all but completely vanished.

The shift in the public’s perception of us now is really very encouraging. Unfortunately in this much hyped General Election, people voted for a change in government and have (some with gritted teeth) reverted back to the old parties.

Our adversaries recognised this probably before us and have done everything to keep us as a small fringe party. Under PR we could easily fill a bus with BNP MPs.

As the coalition negotiations begin, let those who might feel disappointed at the BNP’s failure to secure a parliamentary seat yesterday reflect on what might happen in a short while.

The introduction of PR to Britain will dramatically change the face of British politics and propel the BNP into the mainstream political debate once and for all.

Unfortunately, the high turnout generated by the General Election hype meant that we were also squeezed severely in local elections nationwide.

Our vote remained rock solid but the percentages were against us.

Perhaps the most sobering reality we must now face is the demographic disaster unfolding all over the country, but especially in Barking & Dagenham and London generally. The simple fact is this: we have been swamped by immigrants.

Labour is carrying out a policy of gerrymandering through immigration. This has meant the death of the old East End and by the time of the next General Election, London will be completely unassailable, colonised and in truth no longer part of Britain.

We need to develop a new strategy to protect our dispossessed and marginalised people in these ‘occupied territories.’ As our people are pushed first into political impotence and then into absolute minority status, to continue fighting first-past-the-post elections and securing an ever-dwindling vote is simply a recipe for demoralisation and failure.

We will instead develop a new strategy for these areas, based on civil rights agitation and legal challenges to the authorities whenever they marginalise our white minority.

I know how hard everybody worked and I know there is a positive change in the public’s attitude towards the BNP. You must have felt it too. This tended to lead to raised expectations which, while they have not been this time in the ballot box, do truly reflect the undercurrent of ever growing sympathy for our party and our message. We all know the feeling is there and growing.

At the end of the day, we tripled our vote and we can now build on the huge experience we have gained through fighting two national elections in less than a year.

The glaring item lacking in the BNP armoury is our underdeveloped Elections Department. This will now be the focus of a huge overhaul and re-structuring, bringing it into line with the very best and almost futuristic election machines of Labour and the Lib-Dems.

The BNP has the courage and determination and some of the best politically motivated people of all the parties. However, our methods, tactics and electioneering apparatus are basically 20 years out of date.

This was discussed at a leadership meeting in February and while we recognised the urgent need for modernisation, there was no way we could start to reform and modernise before the election.

Through a substantial investment in administration, fundraising and logistics, the BNP possesses a finely tuned administrative regime. As an example of what the administrative staff can do is illustrated by the fact that all of the 8,000 inquiries received centrally in the six weeks of the campaign, have already been sent information packs.

Some 6,000 have already been databased and passed on to the regional organisers so that follow-up work can start immediately. This is a very rapid and efficient turnaround of an absolutely crucial job.

We do however need to acknowledge that there were very serious problems in the campaign, particularly in the Publicity Department. The new team which took over – Clive Jefferson, Alwyn Deacon and all others involved – did a fantastic job under the most difficult of circumstances in rescuing that situation by the skin of our teeth.

Now we need to focus all of our attention and energies in harnessing and utilising the very best in modern electioneering practices. This will start immediately and this month will see the first event in our new training programme being rolled out.

We need to grasp the huge potential in exploiting postal votes, tele-canvassing and other modern methods and techniques. We also need to equip ourselves to perform well in community politics.

Although the Greens were practically wiped out in this election, they still managed to secure their first MP. How did they do this? They invested heavily on the ground by being fully involved in local community politics. This afforded them ‘credibility’ through an effective presence in community politics. Minority parties can overcome obstacles by producing effective councillors. To do that we need to invest heavily in training for our people who are at the ‘coalface ‘

We are now stronger than ever and have proven ourselves capable of planning, fighting and financing two national election campaigns on the largest scale ever, one after another.

We will now focus on a massive overhaul of our political machinery.

External attacks disguised as internal friction will be a common feature as our political enemies spin their web of lies and deceit designed to prevent us from reaching our true potential. Our enemies’ weapons will be disharmony, conflict, misinformation and never-ending legal warfare.

They will not succeed, but we all must remain ever vigilant. If someone tells you a piece of ’shocking’ internal gossip which clearly is aimed at undermining the people now working to propel the party forward, then you need to treat such lies with the contempt they deserve. Don’t believe, let alone pass on, any such disinformation without telling the target about the allegation and hearing the truth. Our enemies have huge resources at their disposal and will exploit the slightest chink in our armour to inject their poison amongst us.

So let us build on the lessons of the last two years of spectacular growth and advances. We have all worked incredibly hard and I know the price our families pay. Take a break; spend time with your family – because we will have all this to do again in a very short time.

This election has been a shambolic farce for our democracy. However, this is an opportunity for us and now is the time to re-structure, modernise and invest in this party’s election machine and that’s exactly what we ARE going to do.

Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

Griffins LAST Chance to Help the Campaign- “Give Me Money”

Griffins LAST chance to help the Campaign- “Give Me Money”. Yes its all about the money.  Again.

The Election is now just hours away, how on earth will giving money at this stage help? Do they need bus fares?

All the polls and signs are looking good for us,”  according to who? they have lost so many members recently, especialy following Colletgate.

They now realize that their lies about …(the) so called peaceful Islam” which contradicts whats happened recently where a BNP candidate has written to a Stoke mosque asking worshippers for their votes.  Mike Coleman, who is standing in Stoke-on-Trent South, said Muslims should vote BNP because it wants UK troops out of Afghanistan http://1millionunited.org/blogs/blog/2010/05/03/bnp-candidate-asks-for-muslim-votes/

Anyway, here is Griffins letter…

_______________________________________________________________________________

A message from Chairman Nick Griffin:
Last chance to help the 2010 General Election Campaign

Dear Fellow Patriot,

Today, I want to share with you a vision of the incredible opportunities that lie before us right now. As you know on Thursday the nationwide General Election takes place.

I would like to thank you personally for your past support of our Party and I want you to know how very grateful I am for the tremendous faith, generosity and commitment you have shown in our fight to preserve our nation, culture and people.

As you know, a good showing by the BNP across the country on Thursday will send shock waves through the establishment and political elite. It will also send out a clear message to the traitors and enemies of our people that enough is enough. The times indeed are changing and the BNP is on the rise.

The BNP will not be stopped until we win our country back. Of that you have my solemn promise. Our Nation needs a BNP victory to kick start the British fight back.

I am sure you are already well aware that our country is slipping quickly into an abyss brought about by the treason rampant throughout the political class. That’s why I urgently need your financial help to stop these traitors before it’s too late.

I know that if we can do well across the country we stand on the brink of a massive breakthrough in British politics – that’s why I need you to help me finance the ‘BNP 2010 General Election Campaign’.

All the polls and signs are looking good for us, so much so that our enemies are pulling out all the stops to halt the BNP. That’s why it’s absolutely vital that we do not let this opportunity, to raise the flag of British nationalism, slip through our fingers due to a lack of funds.

Your financial support will allow the BNP to deliver a hammer blow to politicians like Gordon Brown, Cameron and Clegg, who are not only responsible for flooding our country with immigrants, but also the corruption, torture and murder of our Nation and our Heritage.

Remember, a good BNP vote will act as a wakeup call to the corrupt and deceitful politicians who seem intent in destroying every last vestige of our British heritage. The loony-left know that even a small victory for the BNP, as do the Tories and their fat-cat friends, will change the British political landscape forever. I want YOU to be part of this with me.

They now realize that their lies about controlled immigration, the Afghanistan war, multiculturalism and so called peaceful Islam are coming back to haunt them. They know that only the BNP pose any kind of threat to their morally bankrupt policies.

That’s why I implore you to send your urgent financial contribution to the BNP as we engage in this election battle – the outcome of which will shape the destiny of our Nation and people for years to come. I urge you to be generous.

Gifts from stout hearted patriots like you of £20, £25 and £50 have made an incredible difference to our success and will continue to do so.

Imagine, just for a moment, the impact that a major BNP election breakthrough would have on this country. A ray of hope would shine bright for the proud, but beleaguered, British people.

The banners of nationalism would be raised and flown defiantly in the face of our enemies. All this is possible if we can raise the our campaign costs.

A BNP victory would also send a clear message to the race traitors of our People and our great Nation that our day is now dawning, and their time is coming to an end. Our success in May means the beginning of the end for them – and they know it.

That is why, when you contribute to the ‘BNP 2010 Election Campaign’ with a gift of £100 or even £500 or £1000 or more, it will spread the message of true British Nationalism and give us a great lift and outstanding advantage in this epic struggle to defend our Nation and our ancient Island Race.

Bear in mind that the other so-called parties, Lib/Lab/Con, will be spending millions on their campaigns. Much of that money will be used merely to stop the BNP.

I am absolutely convinced that their millions are no match for our dedicated candidates, activists and supporters. Remember, they might have their dirty money, but you and I are British Patriots, this is Our Land – and we can never and will never be defeated.

I need you to respond urgently to this email. The future of our Nation is quite literally at stake. Every day lost during our ‘2010 Election Campaign’ will affect our success rate at the ballot, so please respond today. I know I can count on you.

Instead of sending a donation, how about taking the plunge and joining the British National Party? Join the British Resistance today: