The Red And Grey Squirrels Myth
January 1, 2010 in 1MU Mythbuster - Fascist Myths Exposed
The Myth
“The point therefore is that the indigenous British are a fusion of genetically similar Northern and Western European peoples all coming from within a few hundred miles of each other. While more recent migrants from these areas can be easily assimilated therefore given their compatible genotype, the present immigration from the Third World is a very different matter. Species which move into a new area and become established there are called colonisers. Britain is therefore being colonised by foreign populations which are changing the nature of Britain.
[To understand this it is useful to consider a non-emotional parallel: the red and grey squirrel. The red squirrel is the indigenous one, the grey one the coloniser. The grey squirrel will never be termed indigenous, no matter how long it has been here. The term indigenous has a precise scientific meaning. A species either is, or is not, indigenous; it cannot become indigenous.]”
The Truth
Firstly the talk of Third World immigrants not having a ‘compatible genotype’ is pseudo-scientific clap-trap. The genotype is the genetic constitution of a cell, an organism, or an individual. In other words every human being has their own genotype and there is no such thing as a racial or national genotype. If it was scientifically the case that Third World immigrants were genetically incompatible with the native (i.e. white) British population, they’d be unable to interbreed with them. In effect different species as the BNP claims. Seeing as the BNP are obsessed with Third World immigrants destroying the ‘British genotype’ through interbreeding, they’ve managed to completely contradict themselves by saying such a thing is impossible! Only it isn’t impossible because there are mixed-race people and so the BNP obviously don’t understand the concept of genotypes.
So they can only mean not having a ‘compatible genotype’ on a social level, so in other words the immigrants are the wrong colour.
If they are going to talk about pigmentation, that’s all skin colour is, why aren’t red-headed Celts indigenous and Scandinavian blondes non-indigenous? Seeing as humans ultimately have only lived in Britain for 10,000 years, are any humans indigenous to Britain? The other stupid mistake the BNP make (why is it stupid and BNP go together so well?) is using two separate species of animal as a comparison. Classic Nazi cod-science. The Eastern Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), or the Grey Squirrel, is a totally different species from the the red squirrel or Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris).
Observe.
Red Squirrel
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Family: Sciuridae
Genus: Sciurus
Subgenus: Sciurus
Species: S. vulgaris
Grey Squirrel
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Superclass: Tetrapoda
Class: Mammalia
Subclass: Theria
Infraclass: Eutheria
Order: Rodentia
Family: Sciuridae
Genus: Sciurus
Subgenus: Sciurus
Species: S. carolinensis
Different species as the BNP claim. Shall we try the same thing with humans?
Human
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species: Homo sapiens
Subspecies: Homo sapiens sapiens
Hang on, according to the BNP it should go something like.
Briton
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species: Homo Britannicus
And
Immigrant
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species: Homo Immigrantus
Wow, the BNP’s carefully thought out biology thesis was bollocks all along!
Shall we do the same experiment again with a different type of animal? Wolves and dogs?
The BNP argument runs that whites, blacks and Asians are as different as Grey Wolves, Red Wolves and dogs. The passage of time has caused a single species to become radically different in appearance. This is typical BNP phony science.
The genetic variation within the canis family is massive, within humans it’s tiny.
Genus: Canis
Species: Canis rufus = Red Wolf
Species: Canis lupus = Grey Wolf
Species: Canis lupus Subspecies: Canis lupus familiaris = Dog
Genus: Homo
Species: Modern Human = Homo sapiens sapiens
Species: Neaderthal = Homo neanderthalensis
The Red Wolf and the Grey Wolf split 400,000 years ago, before modern humans even existed. The difference between Grey Wolves and Red Wolves is as great as the difference between modern humans and Neanderthals. The dog is a subspecies of Grey Wolf: whites, blacks and Asians aren’t even different subspecies of humans let alone different species. The physical variation is not sufficient and is largely superficial.
So in a few hundred thousand years, assuming you could keep a human population isolated from all the others, you might actually achieve what happened with wolves and squirrels. Perhaps we should stick the BNP on a remote island and see what happens?
© One Million United, 2009
Feed





